Havana Syndrome Parallels: Dismissed Evidence in UFO Investigation Sparks Need for Independent Inquiry

Written by Christopher Sharp - 31 March 2024

Liberation Times has learned that evidence pointing to the advanced nature of certain craft, believed to be of non-human origin, is being disregarded by the U.S. government's Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Office, known as the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO).

Sources speaking to Liberation Times have expressed concern over the similarities between the government's investigations into UAP and Anomalous Health Incidents, also known as Havana Syndrome.

The incidents have seen hundreds of U.S. government and military officials serving abroad report strange, unexplained debilitating symptoms, which have also affected family members and pets.

In 2023, a U.S. intelligence assessment of Anomalous Health Incidents stated:

‘Most IC (Intelligence Community) agencies have concluded that it is 'very unlikely" a foreign adversary is responsible.’

It also found "no credible evidence" that any American foe possessed "a weapon or collection device," including an emitter of electromagnetic energy pulses, that could cause the symptoms.

However, recent reports suggest that evidence indicating such incidents as potential attacks from a foreign power employing radio frequency/microwave devices was either disregarded or unjustly dismissed as unreliable.

A forthcoming investigation by 60 Minutes is poised to reveal fresh evidence suggesting potential involvement of a U.S. adversary in these alleged attacks, casting further doubt on 2023’s intelligence assessment.

Sources confide in Liberation Times that evidence indicating foreign adversary attacks on government officials has been suppressed by the Intelligence Community. This suppression is purportedly aimed at safeguarding intelligence collection methods and averting potential escalation with a foreign power, as such attacks could be construed as acts of war. 

Attorney Mark Zaid, who represents dozens of sufferers told SpyTalk that the government is “completely lying” regarding its knowledge of radio frequency/microwave weapons development:

“If we take what the IC is saying, particularly the CIA, that there's nothing there, there's nothing to look at, no foreign adversary is using this against us, then why are all these publicly available [patent] solicitations, particularly from within the Defense Department.”

Zaid added

“And if they're doing it there, you know they're doing it in the IC.”

Zaid’s distrust of the Intelligence Community’s findings has been shared by the Senate Intelligence Committee’s Vice Chair, Marco Rubio, who doubted the 2023 report’s assessment that environmental factors, illness or pre-existing condition could explain symptoms:

'Upon first glance I am concerned that the Intelligence Community (IC) effectively concluded that U.S. personnel, who reported AHI symptoms, were simply experiencing symptoms caused by environmental factors, illness or preexisting conditions and is potentially rushing to a conclusion while a substantial number of questions remain.'

The new evidence also raises doubts regarding the investigation of UAP from the Department of Defense (DoD) and Intelligence Community.

Much like the Intelligence Community's apparent mishandling of Anomalous Health Incidents, sources allege that the AARO has disregarded or unfairly dismissed compelling evidence and witness testimony suggesting that certain UAP could be classified as advanced craft of unknown or non-human origin.

Sources from within the Intelligence Community have told Liberation Times that evidence linking Russia to Anomalous Health Incidents has long been known, and such sources add that some UAP cannot be attributed to the U.S. or any known Earthly power.

Liberation Times understands that there exists a persistent U.S. government capability to detect and track advanced UAP through radar and satellite, which intelligence officials assess as having a non-human origin.

Furthermore, videos allegedly exist which cast doubt on any prosaic explanation. 

According to sources speaking to Liberation Times, the U.S. has been monitoring advanced UAP for decades, which display the five observables:

  • Anti-gravity lift

  • Sudden and instantaneous acceleration

  • Hypersonic velocities without signatures

  • Low observability, or cloaking

  • Trans-medium travel.

Liberation Times understands that the AARO does have access to compelling data collected by the Intelligence Community and DoD showing advanced performance characteristics of UAP but chooses to ignore it.

The AARO (under the name AOIMSG) was established by the U.S. government 'to address the challenges associated with assessing UAP occurring on or near DoD training ranges and installations.'

UAP incursions over training ranges are not a new problem and date back to at least 1952 when a memo issued by H. Marshall Chadwell, Assistant Director of the Office of Scientific Intelligence (which would later become incorporated within the CIA’s Directorate of Science and Technology)  stated:

‘Sightings of unexplained objects at great altitudes and travelling at high speeds in the vicinity of major U.S. defense installations are of such nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or known types of aerial vehicles.’

Methods of detection and tracking capabilities (some of which are highly classified) are understood to have undergone significant advancements in response to UAP incursions since the 1940s and 50s.

Yet, despite multiple credible whistleblowers coming forward publicly and to Congressional committees stating some UAP are of non-human or unknown origin, their testimony has been undermined or disregarded by the AARO, supported by a media unwilling to scrutinise its findings.

Sources have informed Liberation Times that the AARO's insistence on the necessity for additional sensors is perceived as a mere stalling tactic, employing excuses to delay while grappling with UAP exhibiting advanced and exotic technologies.

Those sources support the claim of one ODNI source who spoke to the Daily Mail in 2022 before the AARO’s first report was published. The source said:

'They don't want to talk about this stuff, because they really, really don't know what the hell they are. That's the truth.'

The AARO’s latest report into UAP, released last month, which had input from the Intelligence Community and DoD summarised:

‘All investigative efforts, at all levels of classification, concluded that most sightings were ordinary objects and phenomena and the result of misidentification.’

The AARO’s former director and now official consultant, Dr Sean Kirkpatrick, has previously stated that the Office “has found no credible evidence thus far of extra-terrestrial activity, off-world technology, or objects that defy the known laws of physics.”

That assessment parrots the Intelligence Community’s apparent faulty assessment of Anomalous Health Incidents, which found "no credible evidence" that any American foe possessed "a weapon or collection device," that could cause the symptoms.

Some of the same journalists who have echoed the Intelligence Community’s findings regarding Anomalous Health Incidents with little scrutiny were invited to a recent press event with the AARO, where they similarly echoed its latest findings regarding UAP with no scrutiny at all.

Outlets which employed the same journalists for both UAP and Anomalous Health Incidents stories included the Washington Post and the New York Times.

Whistleblowers, who claim the existence of illegal retrieval and reverse engineering programs involving non-human craft, have also been brushed aside by the AARO in its latest report, which concluded:

‘AARO determined, based on all information provided to date, that claims involving specific people, known locations, technological tests, and documents allegedly involved in or related to the reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial technology, are inaccurate.’

This can be compared with the intelligence assessment of Anomalous Health Incidents, which in apparent desperation to avoid links to foreign attacks, brushed aside the concerns and experiences of victim, finding:

‘Symptoms reported by US personnel were probably the result  of factors that did not involve a foreign adversary, such as preexisting conditions, conventional illnesses, and  environmental factors.’

Known UAP whistleblowers, such as former senior intelligence officer David Grusch (who did not provide testimony to the AARO), have received extreme scepticism and been undermined by Scientific American, the same publication which published an article asserting that Anomalous Health Incidents could be explained as a mass psychogenic illness.

Of note, a sixth observable of UAP is biological impact, resembling Anomalous Health Incidents, on those who come close to advanced craft.

Lue Elizondo, director of the U.S. government’s former UAP investigation, known as AATIP, has previously told GQ Magazine that pilots who came close to UAP would say they experienced microwave damage:

“Then [a pilot] might say, if [they] had got a little closer, “Lue, I’m at the hospital. I’ve got symptoms that are indicative of microwave damage, meaning internal injuries, and even in my brain there’s some morphology there.’”

The new findings into Anomalous Health Incidents may support the need for an independent UAP investigation, free from the shackles of both the DoD and intelligence agencies. These entities may have proven themselves unreliable and untrustworthy due to their handling of Anomalous Health Incidents.

The longer the DoD and Intelligence Community persist in concealing UAP information whilst promoting debunkers’ theories and rewarding compliant journalists, the more scandalous this situation may become.

Love our content and wish to support the website?

You can now become a Patron: Liberation Times | Patreon

Previous
Previous

Retired Rear Admiral And Former Agency Chief Calls For Expanded UFO Investigation And Greater White House Involvement 

Next
Next

Top Intelligence Office Unable To Publicly Support Pentagon's UFO Report, Despite Oversight Role